Lets say your car has a
maintenance program where anything will be fixed for $20 at the dealership where
you bought the car. You take your car in every six months for diagnostics.
Nothing is ever found to be wrong with your car but after a few years a major
engine problem occurs due to a perfectly preventable problem. Now you need a
whole new engine when the dealership could have just replaced a gasket a couple
of years ago and prevented this whole problem. Let’s say the cost of the engine
replacement is $2000 and the cost to replace a gasket is $200. If the dealership
does not find the 1000 cars who need the gasket replaced they save $200,000.
Then when 1 car actually breaks down, the dealership says the engine died
because the owner probably failed to keep sufficient levels of oil in the car,
thereby refusing to provide a new engine as agreed. If it is blatantly obvious
they might pay the $2000 for a new engine if the customer can prove that the
gasket was what caused the engine to die (an expensive process,proof).
They will say they did all
“tests” to diagnose your illness, but what they won’t tell you is the tests they
did would probably would not find your illness. They won’t tell you there are
other better tests that would have.
From Patricia Easley Carpenteri :
Kaiser
has pushed everyone into and illegal arbitation system where there is
no chance of justice = Kaiser hires the arbitrator and the Independent
Administrator = "
He who pays the piper calls the tune".
I
recently had trouble getting my correct records from Kaiser when I
applied for a Social Security Disability Status for early Medicare (the
health insurance premiums are draining my life savings) - they sent
incomplete
and only recent records totally ignoring my written request for my MRI
report, Kaiser claims my records only go back to when my plan type
changed because after they botched the operation, killing my husband.
I
had to go to individual coverage and they treat that as a
"new"patient/member so they can justify "high-use" premiums on the
grounds of "preexisting conditions" - none of the conditions existed
when I really joined Kaiser back in 1971. They never sent my MRI to
Soc.Sec. When I re-requested my records to be sent
to me, specifying
in writing and by phone that I needed only the type diagnosing my
disabilities they sent a mishmash of many past records most which were
totally useless today. Kaiser better not be hoping to be paid for every
page they copied.
Kaiser
gouges members for more money by making them see multiple doctors in
the same dept and using that as an excuse to charge them "high user"
premiums than they advertise. They have me seeing a doctor for my
shoulders bursitis, another for my tennis elbow, another for my hands -
all in the same Ortho Dept and another doctor in the Physical Medicine
Dept for my neck (she sent me to Phys. Therapy) certainly all are parts
of the same body. My late brother-in-law was a Orthopedic Surgeon with
the Army Air Force, when a wounded soldier was brought to him he did
not refuse to work on him because the injury was in the left leg and
the doctor "only works on right arms" - he treated the whole body.
(Coincidentally Dr. Charles Phillips worked with my
brother-in-law in the 1970's).
Another
example of gouging, my recent tailbone injury Kaiser wanted me to go to
the ER, but admitted they could do nothing for me, the tailbone can't
be cast or splinted and they do not operate to fuse it unless there
is
nerve or spinal damage but they were willing to charge me $100.00
co-payment for doing nothing. Not surprising that I refused "take their
advice" stating that I would only suffer greater pain from driving
myself in and sitting for hours in the ER for no treatment
(because of my back I have pain medications at home) and then more pain
when I drove back home.
Patricia Easley Carpenteri may be reached at:
ppc26@juno.com

From the desk of
Jupirena Stein:
Friday,
August 24th,
2007
Mr. George C. Halvorson
Chairman and Executive Officer
Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc.
1 Kaiser Plz. Ste. 2600
Oakland, California 94612
RE: Medical Crime, Dr. Timothy W. Wild, DDS, MD, ENT Surgeon-Kaiser
Permanente Redwood City, Ca. (1999) and Medicare Fraud; Mr. George E.
Clause Kaiser Permanente’s defense attorney.(2001)
Dear Mr. George C. Halvorson:
My name is Jupirena Stein, I am a former patient at Kaiser Permanente Redwood
City, California.
I am writing this open letter and demanding your response.
Please tell me if you are aware of the crime and Medicare fraud mentioned above on this letter RE.
Before you took office on March 2002, I took my suspicions about these
facts to the attention of Mr. David Lawrence. He ignored its
importance.
It is now your turn.
Medical Crime
On November 19Th, 1999,
Dr. Timothy Wilfred Wild,
(unbeknown to me at that time,) performed a needless Parotidectomy
surgery and an invasive, life threatening vascular surgery on several
of my right cervical vessels for his own gain , without medical need,
without my knowledge and without my permission.
I became severely ill.
I
saw 8 medical specialists at KP Redwood City, California, but none of
them “were able to figure out” what was wrong with my health.
Why
didn't’t they just simply asked Dr. Wild, -What have you done to
this patient? But instead, these physicians simply chose to cover
up his crime against my health. Even I, think they can’t be that
incompetent!
Subsequently, I filed a lawsuit; Stein vs. Kaiser.
vickie@kaiserpapers.infoMedicare Fraud.
KP was represented by
Mr. George E. Clause,
a
partner at Ropers. Majeski, Kohn & Bentley, in San Jose,
California. Mr. Clause claims in his Law Firm’s website (www.rmkb.com)
that he is an experienced Health Care attorney, a member of many
reputable legal institutions and that he have represented KP on medical
malpractice cases.
Because of this public information, one would think that
Mr. Clause clearly, wouldn't’t have to seek to the use of Medicare
fraud when defending Kaiser Permanente in matters involving Medicare
and medical malpractice health insurance legal liability. But in my
case, he chose to.
By doing so, he saved KP money by reversing future medical legal liability
from Kaiser to our Federally Funded Health Care System, Medicare.
Of
course, Mr. George E. Clause can not claim this illegal shifting of the
burden of ALL my future medical care from Kaiser’s future liability to
our tax payers, - an act of his own.
Mr. Bruce Albion Bailey (my
representing attorney) cooperated with him by choosing not to correct
Mr.Clause’s Legal Brief fraudulent information about my health
insurance coverage legality to retired judge
Rebbecca Westerfield
from JAMS San Francisco, Ca. (“,,, who is known for her ability
to grasp legal and factual issues quickly,”) cooperated with Mr. George
E. Clause by choosing to stay silent about the subject of future
medical care, when signing her final award.AMS San Francisco, Ca.
(“,,, who is known for her ability to grasp legal and factual issues
quickly,”) cooperated
with Mr. George E. Clause by choosing to stay silent about the subject of future medical care, when signing her final
award.
And
finally the involvement of the Department of Managed Health Care (DMHC)
through Mr. Lewis Chartrand’s Legal Department and his illegal
destruction of my files, when I asked them for help in these matters.
I often ask myself if Ms. Lucinda Ehnes, DMHC Director (she will receive a copy of this letter) is
aware of KP’s involvement in medical crime and fraud, - in my case or in any other.
It seems to me that neither Kaiser nor the DMHC worry about whose credibility is in danger to be damaged.
Medicare
as a secondary payer is protected by federal laws and must ALWAYS be
properly observed in cases such as mine, and be considered as such.
Section 1862(b) of the Social Security Act 42 USC Section 1395Y(b)(5)
Applicable regulations found at 42 CFR part 411 (1990.)
Retired judge Rebecca Westerfield, the attorneys Mr. Bailey and Mr.
Clause chose not enforce federal laws, as well as neglect KP’s rules
and regulations contents found in Kaiser’s Evidence of Coverage Book
pertaining to Medicare health care coverage liability of patients
such as myself.
In
my opinion, Kaiser Permanente could never be successful in such
matters, (fraud and crime) if they would handle things on their own.
Kaiser
had to have the complete cooperation and the blind loyalty of all these
professionals mentioned in this letter. Without this kind of
cooperation and loyalty, this HMO could be considered safe for ALL
their patients.
Mr. Halvorson, you may wish to clear these facts with me by using our legal system.
I
invite you to do that. After all, my claims of medical crime of this
serious nature and of Medicare fraud, are NOT something Kaiser
Permanente nor the DMHC should take lightly. I know, -I don’t.
Dr.
Wild has the mental and physical capability plus he has the medical
knowledge to commit such a horrendous crime, and he is willing to take
chances with his medical license and with his Board Certification. Dr.
Wild, should NOT be permitted to perform surgery.
Watch my words: chances are, - he will do it again
(if I am indeed the first
one)
No
wonder Kaiser and their attorney Mr. Clause, couldn't find Dr. Wild for
his deposition, even though he was still working at KP.
As a
resident (a non-board certified physician in training) he would
have never been allowed to perform such rare non emergency-surgery,
unsupervised as per court documents. Besides, if Dr. Wild had been
present in the arbitration it would have prevented him from obtaining
his board certification.
These
serious matters involving Dr. Wild showing his clear intentions other
than helping me with my health, and Kaiser Permanente Mandatory Binding
Arbitration System involvement (in my case, through their defense
attorney) in Medicare fraud, is, as you receive this letter, being
announced to the world.
If you chose to stay silent as KP’s executive officer, and chose NOT take a position of ethics and legality,
I will take it as your public admission of guilt and as reckless
disregard to protect Kaiser Permanente‘s patients health and safety.
Evil prevails when the good people are silent, or take no action.”
Regards,
Jupirena Stein
Jupirena Stein may be contacted via e-mail at:
j_u_stein@yahoo.com
CC: Open letter
© Kaiser Papers 2
August2007.html007